Legal Opinion

Carris v. John R. Thomas & Associates, P.C.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 4, 1995No. 82952PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUGER, Vice Chief Justice:

The only question addressed1 is whether the trial court properly granted summary judgment when it found that the contractor, who arbitrated and recovered partial damages from the power authority, was precluded from bringing negligence and fraud claims against third-persons who were not parties to the arbitration proceedings. We find that under the facts presented, the cause is not precluded by the doctrines of claim or issue preclusion.

*525PACTS

Oklahoma Municipal Power Authority (the power authority) hired the architectural firm of John R. Thomas and Associates, P.C.…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. Uptegraft v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  5. Buckner v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Nealis v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  2. Minie v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  3. Salazar v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  4. Lien v. CouchCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  5. TLT Construction Corp. v. A. Anthony Tappe & Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1999

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API