Legal Opinion
Bernadine Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 1, 1996No. 94-15768PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PANNER, District Judge:
In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Bernadine Suitum alleges that the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA) committed an unconstitutional taking and violated her rights to substantive due process and equal protection when it refused to permit her to build a home on her residential lot in the Lake Tahoe Basin. The district court concluded that Sui-tum’s claims were unripe and granted summary judgment to TRPA. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
I. TRPA
TRPA was created in 1969 by the Tahoe Regional Planning Compact. Pub.L. 91-148, 83 Stat. 360; Cal Gov’t Code § 66801; Nev. Rev.Stat. §…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Julie Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Mary Helen Parker and Jean Parker Griffith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Good v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Greenbrier (Lake County Trust Co. No. 1391) v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Bernadine Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.