Legal Opinion
Good v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 22, 1997No. 94-442LPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEROW, Judge.
Plaintiff Lloyd A. Good Jr. alleges that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) denial of his 1990 permit application to dredge and fill wetlands and access navigable waters gave rise to a taking under the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution entitling him to $2,500,000.00 in just compensation. This matter is now before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment on liability. The principal issues raised in those motions are whether the federal denial deprived plaintiffs property of all economic value and, if not, whether that denial interfered with reasonable…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lloyd A. Good, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Norman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Walcek v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Cane Tennessee, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Love Terminal Partners v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.