Legal Opinion

Bernadine Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 4, 1997No. 94-15768Published

1Opinion of the Court

This case having been heard by the United States Supreme Court and reversed, has been remanded to this court for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of the Supreme Court. In its Opinion, the Supreme Court indicated that upon remand, this court should consider the second prong of the two-part test from Williamson County Regional Planning Comm’n v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, 473 U.S. 172, 105 S.Ct. 3108, 87 L.Ed.2d 126 (1985). Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, — U.S. —, — n.8, 117 S.Ct. 1659, 1665 n. 8, 137 L.Ed.2d 980 (1997). Because this issue was not addressed by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Bernadine Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API