Legal Opinion
Julie Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 15, 1986No. 82-6112, 83-6092 and 83-6535PublishedCited by 598 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SKOPIL, Circuit Judge:
The City of Los Angeles (“City”) appeals from the district court’s order awarding attorney’s fees to plaintiff at the trial level. We previously affirmed the judgment of the district court on the merits in this matter. Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles, 762 F.2d 753 (9th Cir.1985). Ancillary to our consideration of the appeal of the district court’s judgment on the merits, we now consider the City’s appeal in these attorney’s fees matters. Also before us is the appellee’s motion for attorney’s fees as a prevailing party on the appeal of the merits in this case.
We…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by598 opinions
- Gates v. DeukmejianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Fair Housing of Marin, a California Non-Profit Corporation v. Jack Combs, D.B.A. Waters Edge ApartmentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Martin Gonzalez, Sr. v. City of MaywoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Welch v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- In Re Washington Public Power Supply System Securities Litigation. Class Chemical Bank, in Its Representative Capacity as Trustee for Bondholders, and Bernstein, Litowitz, Berger & Grossman Milberg, Weiss, Bershad, Specthrie & Lerach Molloy, Jones & Donahue, P.C. v. City of Seattle Oregon Public Entities, Benton Rural Electric Association, Washington Washington Public Power Supply System R.W. Beck and Associates Ebasco Services Incorporated United Engineers & Constructors, Inc. Director Participants' Committee Public Utility District No. 1, of Klickitat County United States of America, on Behalf of Itself and Its Agency, the Bonneville Power Administration State of Washington Bonneville Power Administration, Class and Lawrence Laub v. Continental Assurance Company v. City of Seattle Oregon Public Entities, Benton Rural Electric Association, Washington Washington Public Power Supply System R.W. Beck and Associates Ebasco Services Incorporated United Engineers & Constructors, Inc. Director Participants' Committee Public Utility District No. 1, of Klickitat County United States of America, on Behalf of Itself and Its Agency, the Bonneville Power Administration State of Washington Bonneville Power Administration, Class and Continental Assurance Company v. Berger & Montague, P.A. v. City of Seattle Oregon Public Entities, Benton Rural Electric Association, Washington Washington Public Power Supply System R.W. Beck and Associates Ebasco Services Incorporated United Engineers & Constructors, Inc. Director Participants' Committee Public Utility District No. 1, of Klickitat County United States of America, on Behalf of Itself and Its Agency, the Bonneville Power Administration State of Washington Bonneville Power AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
593 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.