Legal Opinion
Windsor Park Nursing Home v. Hynes
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 7, 1977PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFuchsberg, J.
The issues on this appeal are whether the Special Prosecutor has established a sufficient factual basis for the issuance of an office subpoena duces tecum and, if he has, whether it entitles him tq retain possession of the books and records so subpoenaed for his private examination and audit.
The Special Prosecutor served an office subpoena duces tecum upon a partner in petitioner Windsor Park Nursing Home, which thereupon moved to quash, contending, in the main, that the prosecutor has failed to establish relevancy of the items he seeks and that, in any event, he is not entitled to "seize and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Myerson v. Lentini Brothers Moving & Storage Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Sigety v. HynesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Sussman v. New York State Organized Crime Task ForceNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Heisler v. HynesNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Lewis v. HynesNew York Supreme Court · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Heisler v. HynesNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Brunswick Hospital Center, Inc. v. HynesNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. CreanNew York Supreme Court · 1982
- New York Republican State Committee v. New York State Commission on Government IntegrityNew York Supreme Court · 1988
- Hynes v. LefkowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.