Legal Opinion
People v. Crean
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 23, 1982PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Duncan S. McNab, J.
Pursuant to CPLR 2304, defendant Ronald Crean moves to quash a “trial” subpoena duces tecum calling for production of certain books and financial records pertaining to defendant’s former law practice.1
By way of background, a Grand Jury subpoena duces tecum dated June 23, 1982, calling for production of similar, although not the identical records sought here, was previously served on Mr. Crean, prior to his indictment herein. Said Grand Jury subpoena was withdrawn on July 19,1982 after Mr. Crean had moved to quash it on grounds that production of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- People v. GissendannerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Priest v. HennessyNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Constantine v. LetoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. ChambersNew York Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. Lorenzo, New York County Courts1987
- People v. RamirezNew York Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. BolivarCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.