Sussman v. New York State Organized Crime Task Force
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
We hold that under subdivision 4 of section 70-a of the Executive Law there must be a showing that the matters under investigation involve multicounty "organized crime activities” to authorize the issuance of office subpoenas by the Deputy Attorney-General in charge of the Organized *230Crime Task Force, and that as so interpreted the statute is constitutional. In this respect we distinguish between the prerequisite to issuance of office subpoenas and the prerequisite to appearance by the Deputy Attorney-General before a Grand Jury. (Cf. People v Rallo, 39 NY2d 217.)
The State-wide Organized Crime…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Myerson v. Lentini Brothers Moving & Storage Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Carlisle v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Matter of A'hearn v. Comm. on Unlawful Practice of the Law of the New York County Lawyers'ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- People v. BrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Nicholson v. State Commission on Judicial ConductNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- B. T. Productions, Inc. v. BarrNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Virag v. HynesNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Levin v. MurawskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.