Legal Opinion

Sigety v. Hynes

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 22, 1975PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCooke, J.

The three cases under review raise the fundamental question of whether the Deputy Attorney-General, for his part in the ongoing investigation of the nursing home industry, has subpoena power as provided in subdivision 8 of section 63 of the Executive Law.*

Deputy Attorney-General Hynes appeals from an order of the Appellate Division, First Department, which unanimously affirmed judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County, in Matter of Sigety v Hynes and Matter of East Riv. Nursing Home v Hynes. Each such judgment restrained Hynes from proceeding in excess of his lawful jurisdiction and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Dunham v. OttingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. People Ex Rel. McClelland v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. In re Di BrizziNew York Court of Appeals · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Fink v. LefkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. New York State Bankers Ass'n v. AlbrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Additional January 1979 Grand Jury of Albany Supreme Court v. DoeNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Landau v. HynesNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Sussman v. New York State Organized Crime Task ForceNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API