Legal Opinion

Mills v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 24, 1952No. 11046PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PROCTOR, Circuit Judge.

This appeal presents a question, often recurring, as to the admissibility of incriminating evidence seized from an accused when arrested without a warrant. It arises here in connection with the conviction of appellant for engaging in the operation of a numbers game and knowingly possessing numbers slips. 22 D.C.Code 1940, §§ 1501, 1502.

There is no question as to the governing principles of law. They have been clearly stated in United States v. Rabinowitz, 1950, 339 U.S. 56, 70 S.Ct. 430, 94 L.Ed. 653; Brinegar v. United States, 1949, 338 U.S. 160, 69 S.Ct. 1302, 93…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Trupiano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Junius S. Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  2. Samuel Wrightson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
  3. Jasper J. Morrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  4. Contee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  5. James E. Ford v. United States of America, George Kimble v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API