Legal Opinion

James E. Ford v. United States of America, George Kimble v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided August 24, 1965No. 17835, 17836PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAHY, Circuit Judge,

with whom, Chief Judge BAZELON and Circuit Judges WASHINGTON, DANAHER, BURGER, WRIGHT, McGOWAN, TAMM, and LEVENTHAL join: Appellants were convicted of robbery in violation of 22 D.C.Code § 2901. The trial ■court granted leave to appeal in forma pauperis and the appeals have been consolidated in this court. Several appointed counsel were at different times per*928mitted to withdraw. However, when the appeals were heard by a division of this court oral arguments were presented on appellants’ behalf and their pro se briefs were available. The court entered an order reciting that…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Harold B. Dorman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  2. Daniel J. Bowles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  3. Joseph L. Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  4. Erickson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  5. The United States v. Michael Bazinet, the United States v. George KnoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API