Legal Opinion
United States v. Miranda-Lopez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 17, 2008No. 07-50123PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge SILVERMAN; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge BYBEE.
SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge:
Today we join the D.C. Circuit in holding that the crime of aggravated identity theft, 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(l), requires proof that, among other things, the defendant knew that the means of identification belonged to another person. It is not enough to prove only that the defendant knew he was using a false document. See United States v. Villanueva-Sotelo, 515 F.3d 1234 (D.C.Cir.2008).
I. FACTS
Roberto Miranda-Lopez, a citizen of El Salvador who had previously been deported from the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. Jacob De La FuenteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Flores-Figueroa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. CaronaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. TureseoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- United States v. MillisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.