Legal Opinion
United States v. Millis
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 2, 2010No. 09-10134PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge SIDNEY R. THOMAS; Dissent by Judge BYBEE.
OPINION
THOMAS, Circuit Judge:
Daniel Millis challenges his conviction under 50 C.F.R. § 27.94(a) for placing full, gallon-sized plastic bottles of water on trails in the Buenos Aires National Wildlife Refuge to help alleviate exposure deaths among undocumented immigrants crossing into the United States. Millis concedes that he placed water on refuge *915trails, but argues that his actions did not violate § 27.94(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and reverse Millis’s conviction.
I
On February 22, 2008, United States Fish and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Federal Trade Commission v. Mandel Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. Stuart RommCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re Anheuser-Busch Beer Labeling Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Reina-Rodriguez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- In Re: Roger Evans v. Kathleen McCallisterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- United States v. Yong Jun LiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Vera v. O'KEEFEDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.