Legal Opinion
United States v. Carona
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 6, 2011No. 09-50235PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on January 6, 2011 [680 F.3d 917], is amended as follows:
1. On page 420 of the slip opinion (630 F.3d 917 at 918), replace the last sentence of the paragraph at the top of the page:
We conclude, however, that the actions of the prosecutors did not violate Rule 2-100 and, further, that the district court properly denied suppression of the evidence even if there had been a violation of Rule 2-100.
with the following:
We conclude, however, that the actions of the prosecutors did not violate Rule 2-100 and, therefore, there was no reason for the district court to suppress the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Moskal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. John E. Kenny, Trenton P. Oelberg, and William L. Parker, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Ivan Pena v. Stephen LindleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Donald Wanland, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States Ex Rel. Bennett v. Biotronik, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Ondray McKnightCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Robert RundoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.