Flores-Figueroa v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breyer
A federal criminal statute forbidding “Aggravated identity theft” imposes a mandatory consecutive 2-year prison term upon individuals convicted of certain other crimes if, during (or in relation to) the commission of those other crimes, the offender “knowingly transfers, possesses, or uses, without lawful authority, a means of identification of another person.” 18 U. S. C. § 1028A(a)(l) (emphasis added). The question is whether the statute requires the Government to show that the defendant knew that the “means of identification” he or she unlawfully transferred, possessed, or used, in fact,…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by447 opinions
- Rehaif v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Dubin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2023
- McFadden v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- United States v. BarringtonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. TavaresCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
442 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.