Legal Opinion

United States v. John Doe

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 29, 2016No. 15-10063PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARBIS, Senior District Judge:

Appellant John Doe 1 appeals from his convictions of aggravated identity theft under 18 U.S.C. § 1028A, for knowingly possessing and using the name, birth date, and social security number of another person when he applied to renew a Nevada driver’s license and when he submitted a Form 1-9 Employment Eligibility Verification form to his employer.

Doe contends that the Government failed to prove an element of the offense— specifically that he knew that the false identity he used belonged to a real person. He also challenges the reasonableness of his 78-month…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Flores-Figueroa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. United States v. NevilsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Karen GagarinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. Michael KimbrewCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. Paige ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
  4. United States v. Angel MondragonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  5. United States v. Christopher SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API