Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Spillman v. Thedford Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1926No. 24577PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.

The Thedford Bank, defendant, is an insolvent state bank, organized under the laws of Nebraska, in the possession and control of a receiver duly appointed, and to whom the provisions of the law guaranteeing lawful- deposits was applicable. In this proceeding, claimant K'irkman prosecutes two causes of action against the bank, its receiver, and the guaranty fund; one based upon a certificate of deposit of $1,000 issued by the defendant bank, the validity of which is not questioned, and one upon an alleged deposit of $450 in the form of a checking account on which it was alleged there was still…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hier v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. Home Savings Bank v. OtterbachSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  3. Mendel v. BoydNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  4. DeBaca v. HigginsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
  5. State ex rel. Davis v. Farmers State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Schwenker v. ParryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. State Bank v. BacheNew York Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Bliss v. Live Stock National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Haynes v. Lincoln Trust Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1944
  5. Dempster v. AckleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API