State ex rel. Spillman v. Thedford Bank
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.
The Thedford Bank, defendant, is an insolvent state bank, organized under the laws of Nebraska, in the possession and control of a receiver duly appointed, and to whom the provisions of the law guaranteeing lawful- deposits was applicable. In this proceeding, claimant K'irkman prosecutes two causes of action against the bank, its receiver, and the guaranty fund; one based upon a certificate of deposit of $1,000 issued by the defendant bank, the validity of which is not questioned, and one upon an alleged deposit of $450 in the form of a checking account on which it was alleged there was still…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hier v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Home Savings Bank v. OtterbachSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Mendel v. BoydNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
- DeBaca v. HigginsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
- State ex rel. Davis v. Farmers State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schwenker v. ParryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- State Bank v. BacheNew York Supreme Court · 1937
- Bliss v. Live Stock National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
- Haynes v. Lincoln Trust Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1944
- Dempster v. AckleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.