DeBaca v. Higgins
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to Arapahoe District Court.—Hon. Charles McCall, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbert
The transaction by which plaintiff in error received the draft and certificate of deposit was a personal one with Bowlds, and not with the bank. By the issuance of these obligations Bowlds undertook to discharge his individual indebtedness to the plaintiff in error, by issuing a draft and certificate of deposit signed by him as cashier.
The official of a bank in charge of its business is its agent, but his authority is limited to those transactions in connection with the affairs of the bank, which are usually exercised by such officer, so that the test to apply in ascertaining if the bank he…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hier v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Anderson v. KissamU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1888
- Campbell v. Manufacturers National BankSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
- Langlois v. GragnonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
- St. Charles Savings Bank v. Orthwein Investment Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1911
3Cited by9 opinions
- Matter of King Resources Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1982
- Pemiscot County Bank v. Central-State Nat. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
- Gordon v. PettingillSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
- Harwood v. Ft. Worth Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- State ex rel. Spillman v. Thedford BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.