Hier v. Miller
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Doniphan district court; William I. Stuart, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion *of the court was delivered by
Burch, J.:
Briefly summarized, the essential facts of this controversy are as follows: The cashier of a bank organized under the laws of this state was allowed the sole charge and conduct of its affairs by its board of directors. He was indebted individually to a depositor of the bank, and on different occasions *259pretended to make payments upon such indebtedness by giving the depositor credit upon her pass-book. Such credits were not shown upon any other memo-randa of the bank’s business and were not entered upon its books. The last transaction of this…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Merchants' Bank v. State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- N. Rogers & Sons v. BatchelorSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- West St. Louis Savings Bank v. Shawnee County BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Claflin v. Farmers' & Citizens' Bank of Long IslandNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Wilson v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Cobe v. Coughlin Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- Washbon v. Linscott State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
- Home Savings Bank v. OtterbachSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1906
- Ohio Valley Banking & Trust Co. v. Citizens National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.