Schwenker v. Parry
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.
Were it not for the fact that defendant s eminent counsel so earnestly contend that the decision of this court in Columbia Bank v. Morgan, 198 Wis. 476, 224 N. W. 707, recently decided, is unsound and out of harmony with the established law, we should deem it unnecessary to say more than that this controversy is ruled by that case and affirm the trial court. The Columbia Bank Case and the present case are in all respects strikingly similar. It is true that the Columbia Bank Case was decided by a divided court. When this court first conferred on the present case, both the majority and the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- National Bank v. BurkhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Hier v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Pemiscot County Bank v. Central-State Nat. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
- Rankin v. Chase National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Markville State Bank v. SteinbringSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Home Savings Bank v. GertenbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Hawkins Realty Co. v. Hawkins State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Fine v. Harney County National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- Haynes v. Lincoln Trust Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1944
- Matz v. IbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.