Legal Opinion

Mendel v. Boyd

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1904No. 13,487PublishedCited by 11 opinions

ERROR to the district court for Douglas county: Willard W. Slaubaugh, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Albert, C.

One, since deceased, while cashier of a state hank in Iowa, embezzled f18,000 of the funds of the bank. Herman Mendel, the plaintiff in this action, and another were his bondsmen, and made good the shortage. A large portion of the funds thus embezzled were lost by the cashier in gambling on the board of trade, through the defendant who conducted a commission house. The plaintiff by assignment succeeded to the rights of his fellow bondsman in the premises, and brought this action against the defendant for the full amount of the cashier’s shortage to the bank. The petition sets forth…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. KissamU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1888
  2. Lee v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Bank of Moore v. ForsythMontana Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Bode v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Bauer v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Hankins v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Kuhns v. Live Stock National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API