Legal Opinion

Schmeck v. Bogatay

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1971PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is an action to enforce payment of additional rent alleged to be due under the provision of a lease which increased the minimum monthly rental payments from $450 to $625 per month upon the occurrence of conditions which are the subject of this controversy. The case was tried before the court, sitting without a jury. Defendant appeals from a $2,800 judgment for plaintiffs.

In November 1961 plaintiffs leased to defendant a building in downtown Klamath Palls for operation of a shoe store. Defendant had previously been a tenant on the same premises and had also owned two other shoe stores.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Waterway Terminals Co. v. P. S. Lord Mechanical ContractorsOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Mahoning Inv. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
  3. Marshall v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Earls v. ClarkeOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. State Ex Rel. Security Savings & Trust Co. v. School District No. 9Oregon Supreme Court · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hess v. SeegerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  2. Shaw v. Northwest Truck Repair, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Ikon Office Solutions, Inc. v. American Office Products, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2001
  4. Johnson v. KentnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. Donohoe v. Mid-Valley Glass Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API