Schmeck v. Bogatay
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.
This is an action to enforce payment of additional rent alleged to be due under the provision of a lease which increased the minimum monthly rental payments from $450 to $625 per month upon the occurrence of conditions which are the subject of this controversy. The case was tried before the court, sitting without a jury. Defendant appeals from a $2,800 judgment for plaintiffs.
In November 1961 plaintiffs leased to defendant a building in downtown Klamath Palls for operation of a shoe store. Defendant had previously been a tenant on the same premises and had also owned two other shoe stores.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Waterway Terminals Co. v. P. S. Lord Mechanical ContractorsOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Mahoning Inv. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
- Marshall v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- Earls v. ClarkeOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- State Ex Rel. Security Savings & Trust Co. v. School District No. 9Oregon Supreme Court · 1934
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hess v. SeegerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Shaw v. Northwest Truck Repair, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Ikon Office Solutions, Inc. v. American Office Products, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2001
- Johnson v. KentnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Donohoe v. Mid-Valley Glass Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.