Legal Opinion
Donohoe v. Mid-Valley Glass Co.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided April 8, 1987No. 16-84-09895; CA A40016PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing her negligence and Unlawful Trade Practices Act (UTPA) action against defendants Mid-Valley Glass Co. and Brundage on the ground that the action is barred by the applicable statutes of limitations. ORS 12.110(1); ORS 646.638(5). Plaintiff argues that the trial court erred by allowing defendants’ motions to dismiss, because her fourth amended complaint alleged facts which would permit a finding that defendants were estopped to assert the limitations bar. We disagree and affirm.
Plaintiff alleged that, in constructing a house for her in 1981, Brundage…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bennett v. CITY OF SALEMOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Lyden v. GoldbergOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Hess v. SeegerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Axia, Inc. v. I. C. Harbour Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Bash v. Fir Grove Cemeteries, Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gehrke v. CrafCo, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Beals v. Breeden Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Castleman v. DavisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- Chester Gunter v. Erin Reyes; Dr. Roberts; Dr. Norton; Dr. Mark Patton.District Court, D. Oregon · 2026
- Roberson Motors, Inc. v. Cooper Lighting, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.