Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Kentner

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 21, 1984No. 31309; CA A28913PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.

Plaintiff brought this action for damages for personal injuries approximately three years after he was involved in a snowmobile accident. The trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the basis that the Statute of Limitations bars plaintiffs claim. The issues on appeal concern the notice provisions of ORS 12.155, estoppel as a bar to defendants’ reliance on the Statute of Limitations and defendants’ entitlement to a separate trial on that defense. We affirm.

As the parties seeking summary judgment, defendants have the burden of proving that there is no material issue of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Farris v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Bennett v. CITY OF SALEMOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Lyden v. GoldbergOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Duncan v. DubinOregon Supreme Court · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bailey v. GreenbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. City of Burlington v. Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2002
  3. Herman v. Valley InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. Gehrke v. CrafCo, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. Donohoe v. Mid-Valley Glass Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API