Legal Opinion
Ferran v. Mulcrevy
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 11, 1935No. Civ. 9926PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.
While standing between the double tracks of the Southern Pacific Company at Lomita Park Station in San Mateo County, waiting to board a northbound train, the petitioner, Phillip Ferran, was struck on the elbow by the overhang of the locomotive of a southbound train, and on account of the injuries he sustained he brought an action for damages against said company and John E. Monroe, the locomotive fireman. At the trial a jury awarded Ferran a verdict, but under the authority of section 629 of the Code of Civil Procedure the defendants in the action moved for judgment in their favor…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lauritsen v. GoldsmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Dixon v. HartnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Kies v. SearlesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Eades v. TrowbridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Wegmann v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Casetta v. United States Rubber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Weaver v. Shell CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Sutherland v. PalmeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Davcon, Inc. v. Roberts & MorganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Noack v. ZellerbachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.