Legal Opinion

Eades v. Trowbridge

California Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1904No. Sac. No. 1047PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Modoc County setting aside a verdict. J. W. Harrington, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, C.

This action was brought to recover possession of thirteen cows, two yearlings, and three calves, or the value thereof, in case a delivery cannot be had, with damages. The case was tried with a jury, and at the close of the testimony the case was submitted and the jury returned a verdict for defendants. Thereupon the court, in the presence of the jury, on the twenty-third day of March, 1901, on its own motion, made an order vacating and setting aside the verdict, and on the twenty-fifth day of March, 1901, made an order setting the ease down for retrial on- the thirtieth day of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Townley v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Mizener v. BradburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Irwin v. TowneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. v. ThomasonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  2. Western Electroplating Co. v. HennessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Lauritsen v. GoldsmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Barker v. McKellarIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Hayden v. Consolidated Mining & Dredging Co.California Court of Appeal · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API