Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Board of Education

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 29, 1932No. Docket No. 8696PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Petitioner has been employed by respondents continuously since January 22, 1923, as a teacher in the day high schools of the city and county of San Francisco, and continuously since January 16, 1927, as principal of the Humboldt Evening High School. On May 4, 1932, respondent Board of Education passed a resolution purporting to dismiss petitioner from his employment as principal of the evening school, and this proceeding was instituted to compel the board to annul that resolution and to restore petitioner to his original status.

The distinction between this case and Cullen v. Board…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Kennedy v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Esberg v. BadaraccoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Whitmore v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Cullen v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ging v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. Butterworth v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Smith v. Darby School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Holbrook v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. State Ex Rel. Bass v. Vernon Parish School BoardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1940

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API