Holbrook v. Board of Education
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
This is an appeal on an agreed statement from a judgment denying a petition for writ of mandate. Respondents are the the Board of Education of the Palo Alto Unified School District, the individual members of the board, and the superintendent of schools of the district. Appellant, claiming full-time tenure rights by virtue of his full-time employment in the school district for seven consecutive school years, seeks to compel respondent board to reinstate him to his prior position and to employ him as a full-time employee of the district in a position or positions requiring certification…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Fry v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Rible v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Abraham v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Kacsur v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Mitchell v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- City and County of San Francisco v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Balen v. Peralta Junior College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Barthuli v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Main v. Claremont Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Peralta Federation of Teachers Local 1603 v. Peralta Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.