Legal Opinion
Smith v. Aztec Well Servicing Co.
District Court, D. New Mexico
Decided May 24, 2004No. CIV. 00-957LH/RLPPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HANSEN, Senior District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendant’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Docket No. 337). The Court, having considered the" pleadings submitted by the parties, the arguments of counsel, the trial transcript, the applicable law, and otherwise being fully advised, finds that the Defendant’s motion is well taken and should be granted.
I. Background
The Plaintiffs here are rig hands who work on oil and gas wells in northwest New Mexico for the Defendant Aztec Well Servicing Co. They filed this collective action pursuant…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Steiner v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Ted L. Lindow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Adams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Mendez v. Radec Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 2005
- Brubach v. City of AlbuquerqueDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2012