Legal Opinion
Saba v. Pioneer Contracting Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 5, 1925PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
Before the commissioner, the defendants moved for a correction of the finding in the following particulars. By adding after paragraph ten thereof the following •
“10a. The instruction to the men to meet the truck on the first morning of their employment, at the Hamilton Avenue School, to be taken to the job, was given because the foreman, Ignazzio Firantello, was unable to go. with the men to the job, and they did not know where the work was.
“10b. The truck upon which the decedent was riding at the time he was injured, was not under the control of the employer, nor had he any right to direct…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mann v. Glastonbury Knitting Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Procaccino v. E. Horton & SonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Corvi v. Stiles & Reynolds Brick Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Merlino v. Connecticut Quarries Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
- Diaz v. Warren Brothers Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
3Cited by20 opinions
- Sylcox v. National Lead Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1931
- Stakonis v. United Advertising CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Flanagan v. Webster & WebsterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Howes v. Stark Bros. Nurseries & Orchards Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1930
- Guiliano v. Daniel O'Connell's SonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.