Corvi v. Stiles & Reynolds Brick Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
The commissioner reached the conclusion that the injury which caused the death of the decedent arose out of and in the course of his employment.
The question presented to us by this record is whether, under the subordinate facts found, that conclusion could be legally and logically drawn from them.
No question is raised by the appeal relating to a correction of the finding of the commissioner.
When a certain method of approach to a plant involves the subjection of an employee to a peculiar risk, as in crossing a railroad track, the question whether such a risk is an incident of the employment…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Sundine's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Procaccino v. E. Horton & SonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
3Cited by32 opinions
- Bountiful Brick Co. v. GilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Scott v. WillisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1928
- Whitney v. Hazard Lead WorksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Flanagan v. Webster & WebsterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Howes v. Stark Bros. Nurseries & Orchards Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1930
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.