Legal Opinion
Lin v. Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 22, 2008No. 08 Civ. 242(CM)PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
McMAHON, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Plaintiff brings this federal securities class action alleging violations of Sections II, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “1933 Act”), codified at 15 U.S.C. §§ 77k, 77l (a) (2), and 77o, against Defendants Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. and Thomas Peterffy. Defendants move to dismiss Plaintiffs claims pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).
For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Mills v. Polar Molecular Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Kramer v. Time Warner Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Iqbal v. HastyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP v. Wachovia Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System v. Energysolutions, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- In Re Fuwei Films Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- In re General Electric Co. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Scott v. General Motors Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.