Legal Opinion
Paul Muller Industrie GmbH & Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided May 26, 2006No. Consol. 04-00522PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLACH, Judge.
I
Introduction
Plaintiffs Paul Mueller Industrie, GmbH & Co. (“Paul Mueller”); FAG Kugelfischer AG, FAG Italia S.p.A., Barden Corporation (U.K.) Limited, FAG Bearings Corporation, and the Barden Corporation (“collectively FAG”); SKF USA Inc., SKF France S.A., Sarma, SKF GmbH, and SKF Industrie S.P.A. (collectively “SKF”); and Timken U.S. Corporation (“Timken”) challenge the United States Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce” or “the Department”) findings in Antifriction Bearings and Parts Thereof From France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Singapore, and the United Kingdom: Final…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Skf USA Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Paul Muller Industries Gmbh & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Corus Staal BV v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- NMB Singapore Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.