Legal Opinion

Callioux v. Progressive Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided November 18, 1987No. 860309-CAPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BILLINGS, Judge:

Appellants David and Lori Callioux (“the Callioux”) filed suit against respondent Progressive Insurance Company (“Progressive”) alleging bad faith denial of a first-party insurance claim, malicious prosecution, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The district court denied the Cal-lioux’ motion for continuance and granted Progressive’s motion for summary judgment, from which the Callioux appeal. We affirm.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The Callioux, Progressive’s insured, filed a claim under their automobile insurance policy for the total loss of their Jeep vehicle. The…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Beck v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Modern Home Institute, Inc. And Romac Resources, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  3. Pasternak v. Lear Petroleum Exploration, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  4. Samms v. EcclesUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Mid-South Grizzlies v. National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. American Towers Owners Ass'n v. CCI Mechanical, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Prince v. Bear River Mutual Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Amica Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchettlerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  4. Hodges v. Gibson Products Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Heslop v. Bear River Mutual Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2017

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API