Callioux v. Progressive Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BILLINGS, Judge:
Appellants David and Lori Callioux (“the Callioux”) filed suit against respondent Progressive Insurance Company (“Progressive”) alleging bad faith denial of a first-party insurance claim, malicious prosecution, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The district court denied the Cal-lioux’ motion for continuance and granted Progressive’s motion for summary judgment, from which the Callioux appeal. We affirm.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The Callioux, Progressive’s insured, filed a claim under their automobile insurance policy for the total loss of their Jeep vehicle. The…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Beck v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Modern Home Institute, Inc. And Romac Resources, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Pasternak v. Lear Petroleum Exploration, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Samms v. EcclesUtah Supreme Court · 1961
- Mid-South Grizzlies v. National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- American Towers Owners Ass'n v. CCI Mechanical, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
- Prince v. Bear River Mutual Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
- Amica Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchettlerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- Hodges v. Gibson Products Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
- Heslop v. Bear River Mutual Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2017
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.