Legal Opinion
Modern Home Institute, Inc. And Romac Resources, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 11, 1975No. 371, Docket 74-1965PublishedCited by 108 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANSFIELD, Circuit Judge:
The central issue on this appeal is whether, in this treble-damage suit brought under § 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, charging defendants-ap-pellees with a concerted refusal to deal with plaintiffs-appellants, the district court was warranted in granting summary judgment dismissing the complaint; more specifically whether the evidence was susceptible of inferences that would raise genuine issues as to material facts, entitling plaintiffs to a trial. We hold that upon the record the defendants were entitled to judgment as a matter of law, and affirm.
The gist of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by108 opinions
- Apex Oil Co. v. DiMauroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Golf City, Inc., Cross v. Wilson Sporting Goods Co., Inc., CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Merit Motors, Inc. v. Chrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Admiral Theatre Corp. v. Douglas Theatre Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Willmar Poultry Company v. Morton-Norwich Products, Inc., and Richardson-Merrell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.