Legal Opinion

Consolidated Freightways v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 3, 1992No. 238 C.D. 1991PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAIG, President Judge.

Consolidated Freightways (employer) appeals a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board that (1) affirmed a referee’s order granting the employer’s termination petition and (2) reversed the referee’s order limiting the employer’s responsibility for medical expenses to those incurred before March 16, 1988. We affirm the board’s decision except that portion which reverses the referee’s order limiting the employer’s responsibility for the claimant’s medical expenses.

This case presents a need for this court to address a question which Judge Barbieri, in his…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Boehm v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Dasconio v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Deremer v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Fuhrman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stonebraker v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Kerns v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Strattan Homes, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Corcoran v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Southern Chester County Hospital v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API