Oliver v. AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KOLKEY, J.
After an existing 110-foot cellular telephone transmission tower on their neighbors’ property was replaced by one that was approximately 20 feet taller, plaintiffs Melvin E. Oliver and Brigitte M. Oliver brought this action against their neighbors, John J. and Joyce A. Permann (the Permanns), various cellular telephone companies, and the County of Butte (the County), claiming inverse condemnation, nuisance, intentional and negligent misrepresentation, suppression of fact, and 4 other causes of action.
The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the Permanns and the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Varjabedian v. City of MaderaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Venuto v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- Varney & Green v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Sowers v. Forest Hills SubdivisionNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Cook v. Rockwell International Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 2003
- Tarlton v. KaufmanMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- LAUBENSTEIN v. BODE TOWER, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- City of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.