Legal Opinion
State v. Maddox
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided October 21, 2008No. 30,526PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAES, Justice.
{1} This ease involves a twenty-eight-month delay in prosecution caused by Defendant’s incarceration in another state and the parties’ intermittent plea negotiations. A grand jury indicted Defendant on September 21, 2001, for unlawful taking of a vehicle, contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 66-3-504(A)(2) (1998) or, in the alternative, embezzlement, contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 30-16-8 (1995, prior to amendments through 2007). The State did not arrest Defendant until July 14, 2003, when Defendant was extradited to New Mexico after serving a prison sentence in Florida.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Smith v. HooeySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Dickey v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- State v. GarzaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. ArrendondoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. SpearmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. SavedraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.