Legal Opinion

State v. Boyer

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 1985No. 8175PublishedCited by 200 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENDLEY, Judge.

The issue in this case concerns the extent this court will consider pro se pleadings filed by a party who is represented by counsel.

Here, a docketing statement was filed by trial counsel, raising three issues: (1) an involuntary guilty plea because the plea agreement required defendant and his co-defendant to plead, or else neither plea would be accepted; (2) lack of a factual basis for the guilty plea; and (3) improper calculation of credit for time served. NMSA 1978, Crim., Child.Ct., Dom.Rel. & W/C App.R. 205 (Repl.Pamp.1983). We proposed summary affirmance. NMSA…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. State v. FranklinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by200 opinions

  1. State v. MontoyaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. State v. JacobsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. MontoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. SalgadoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. State v. ReyesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002

195 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API