Legal Opinion

State v. Roybal

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided August 16, 1995No. 15400PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALARID, Judge.

Defendant appeals from his conviction as a habitual offender. Defendant raises four issues on appeal: (1) whether the trial court had jurisdiction since he had already served the underlying sentence as of the date of the habitual offender proceeding; (2) whether the trial court erred in admitting evidence of a prior unrelated plea agreement; (3) whether the State’s failure to disclose its intention to seek admission of prior plea agreements violated Defendant’s right to due process; and (4) whether the State acted vindictively in seeking the sentence enhancement after…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Swafford v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Kelly Inn No. 102, Inc. v. KapnisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. RoybalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. State v. HarrisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. State v. BachichaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. AkerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. State v. FreedNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. State v. FreedNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. State v. PorrasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. State v. VillalobosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API