State v. Roybal
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALARID, Judge.
Defendant appeals from his conviction as a habitual offender. Defendant raises four issues on appeal: (1) whether the trial court had jurisdiction since he had already served the underlying sentence as of the date of the habitual offender proceeding; (2) whether the trial court erred in admitting evidence of a prior unrelated plea agreement; (3) whether the State’s failure to disclose its intention to seek admission of prior plea agreements violated Defendant’s right to due process; and (4) whether the State acted vindictively in seeking the sentence enhancement after…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Swafford v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Kelly Inn No. 102, Inc. v. KapnisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. RoybalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. HarrisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. BachichaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. AkerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. FreedNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. FreedNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. PorrasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. VillalobosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.