Legal Opinion
Norwest Mortgage, Inc. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 28, 1999No. D032050PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MCDONALD, J.
Real parties in interest Bruce H. and Kathleen Conley and Kenneth and Dorine Younger (collectively plaintiffs) sued Norwest Mortgage, Inc. (Norwest Mortgage), alleging that Norwest Mortgage’s “Forced Placement Insurance” (FPI) program was an unfair business practice under California’s unfair competition law (UCL). (Bus. & Prof. Code 1 , § 17200 et seq.) Plaintiffs allege that on lapse or cancellation of the insurance they were required to maintain as borrowers from Norwest Mortgage, Norwest Mortgage provided replacement insurance under the FPI program and charged the cost…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hurtado v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Stop Youth Addiction, Inc. v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Diamond Multimedia Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Bernhard v. Harrah's ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Wash. Mut. Bank v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Anschutz Corp. v. Merrill Lynch & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Barbara's Sales, Inc. v. Intel Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2007
- Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2006
- Sullivan v. Oracle Corp.California Supreme Court · 2011
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.