Legal Opinion

Norman v. Refsland

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 9, 1985No. C6-85-233PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Respondent Harry Norman was employed as a deputy sheriff for Carver County. On February 5, 1984, he was injured while acting within the scope of his employment. He and his wife subsequently brought suit against alleged third party tortfeasors. Appellant Carver County, Norman’s self-insured employer, has paid worker’s compensation in an amount more than $30,000, for claims related to Norman’s injury. Carver County sought to intervene in the action. The trial court refused intervention, but ordered that the county be included in settlement discussions and notified of court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Naig v. Bloomington SanitationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Engelrup v. PotterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. Easterlin v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Miller v. Astleford Equipment Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Mehralian v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Norman v. RefslandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API