Legal Opinion

Miller v. Astleford Equipment Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 22, 1983No. C2-82-1171PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COYNE, Justice.

Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company appeals from an order denying its motion to intervene of right pursuant to Minn.R.Civ.P. 24.01 in this suit by plaintiffs Henry J. Miller, Jr. and Barbara Miller to recover damages for personal injuries from defendant Astleford Equipment Co. Inc. (Astleford). The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred by concluding that Prudential failed to satisfy the criteria of Minn.R.Civ.P. 24.01. We answer this question in the affirmative and, accordingly, reverse.

On January 16, 1981, Henry Miller went to Astleford, an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Engelrup v. PotterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Milbrandt v. American Legion Post of MoraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Norman v. RefslandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Fox v. City of HoldingfordCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Gruman v. HendricksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Miller v. Astleford Equipment Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API