Legal Opinion
Mehralian v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 4, 1984No. C1-83-1270PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
Appellant seeks reversal of the jury verdict for misdemeanor theft (Minn.Stat. Sec. 609.52) on the ground that he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to call witnesses in his defense and that the state was guilty of prosecutorial misconduct. We affirm.
PACTS
Appellant-defendant was convicted of misdemeanor theft, a violation of Minn. Stat. See. 609.52. On January 24, 1983 the appellant was apprehended by a store security officer, James Matters, outside the Sears, Roebuck Company in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The appellant was arrested after Matters saw him shoplift a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. SwainSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. HaneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- State v. SalazarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Lamberton v. LambertonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re Name Change of SIMPKINSCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Norman v. RefslandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- In Re SimpkinsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- State, Campaign Finance & Public Disclosure Board v. Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor PartyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003