Amador Gold Mine, Ltd. v. Amador Gold Mine
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. W. R. Dangerfield, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
The plaintiff, an English corporation, brought this action against the defendant, a California corporation, for a forcible detainer (as defined by section 1160 of the Code of Civil Procedure) of a certain *347tract of mineral land on which is a quartz lode, a sixty-stamp quartz mill, and other improvements, situate in the county of Amador.
The complaint consists of two counts—the first, under the second division of section 1160, alleging an unlawful entry upon said premises on July 14, 1893, in the absence of plaintiff, and a refusal to surrender possession for the period of five days…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kidder v. StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Johnson v. VanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Robarts v. HaleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Davis v. BaughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Miller v. HickenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Antonelle v. Kennedy & Shaw Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Young v. LoprestiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928