Robarts v. Haley
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
The complaint is sufficient in its statement of facts to constitute a cause of action.
*398The court rendered the following decision:—
“I. On the 2d day of November, 1880, plaintiff and defendant were attorneys and counselors at law, admitted to practice as such. On that day they were, by a written document for that purpose made, employed by Aurelio "W. Sepulveda, Bamon D. Sepulveda, and Budicinda F. Sepulveda, in any and all suits that were then or might thereafter exist, in the courts of this State in the matter of the Bancho Palos Verdes, and to bring suits. At that time there was pending in the…
2Cited by13 opinions
- McCann v. ToddSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
- Keene v. KeeneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Chamberlain v. WoodinIdaho Supreme Court · 1890
- Langdon v. KennedyNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
- Hardin v. HardinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.