Miller v. Hicken
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of. the Superior Coúrt of Placer County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
This action was brought by plaintiff to foreclose a mortgage executed to him by defendant Hicken July 1,1881, to secure a note for twelve thousand dollars and interest, upon the southeast quarter and the west half of section 2, township 11 north, range 5 east, Mount Diablo base and meridian. Johnson and wife were made defendants, as claiming some interest in the land; and they answered, averring that on January 11, 1888, plaintiff had released and discharged said mort*231gage; that afterwards they purchased ¿he land from Hicken; and that they are owners and in possession of the land, unencumbered…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Evans v. BlankenshipArizona Supreme Court · 1895
- Spencer v. DuncanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Tanner v. Provo Bench Canal & Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1911
- Bridges v. CooperTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
- Immerman v. ImmermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.