Legal Opinion
Peter Daniels Realty, Inc. v. Northern Equity Investors, Group, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 21, 2003PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
¶ 1 We address the question of whether a provider of water to a specific limited community should be deemed a “public utility” as defined in 66 Pa.C.S. § 102. We conclude that unless the water service is available to all members of the public who may require it, such a provider is not a “public utility” as defined in 66 Pa.C.S. § 102.
¶2 This is an appeal from an order granting the Petition for Contempt brought by Appellee Northern Equity Investors Group, Inc. (“NEIG”) against Appellant Wheatfield Village Homeowners’ Association (“Wheatfield”). For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
¶3 NEIG…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Drexelbrook Associates v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Aronimink Transportation Co. v. P. S. C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. ByrneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Warwick Water Works, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
3Cited by2 opinions
- Connor v. Crozer Keystone Health SystemSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Strausser Enterprises, Inc. v. Segal & Morel, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014