Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Road Commission v. Howes

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1968No. 10831PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLISTER, Justice:

The State of Utah, by and through its Road Commission, appeals from a judgment, pursuant to a jury verdict, awarding the Binghams severance damages in a condemnation action.

It is not disputed that the portion of the Binghams’ property taken by the State left the remainder without an access to a highway. However, the State contends that the trial court committed error in permitting evidence to this effect, for the purpose of establishing severance damages, because the Binghams had not first established that they could not have, by purchase or otherwise, secured a new access.

I…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Provo River Water Users' Ass'n v. CarlsonUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  3. State Ex Rel. Rich v. Dunclick, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1955
  4. City of St. Louis v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  5. Sigurd City v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Pleasant Hill v. First Baptist ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Utah Department of Transportation v. Rayco Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State Ex Rel. Road Commission v. WilliamsUtah Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State Ex Rel. Road Commission v. Style-Crete, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Utah Department of Transportation v. Rayco Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API