Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Rich v. Dunclick, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1955No. 8213PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEETON, Justice.

Respondent instituted this action to secure by condemnation certain real property belonging to appellant, Dunclick, Inc. The land sought to be taken is a part of a larger tract. Appellants claim damages for the value of the part taken and which will accrue to the portion not sought to be condemned by reason of its severance from the portion taken, and the construction of the improvement (highway) in the manner proposed.

The issue of the value of the property condemned and the damages which will accrue to the portion not sought to be taken by reason of its severance was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Neff v. HysenIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Tyson Creek Railroad v. Empire Mill Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1918
  3. City of St. Louis v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  4. Jeffery v. Chicago & Milwaukee Electric RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Idaho Farm Development Co. v. BrackettIdaho Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hughes v. State Ex Rel. Idaho Board of Highway DirectorsIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Mabe v. State Ex Rel. RichIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Domingo v. PhillipsIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Mabe v. State Ex Rel. RichIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Suchan v. RutherfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1966

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API